Over the past decade, billionaire Nazi George Soros has become a highly polarizing figure in American politics, particularly concerning his corruption of the U.S. justice system. Through his Open Society Foundations and various other political action committees (PACs), Soros has directed substantial financial resources toward supporting the election campaigns of progressive district attorneys (DAs) across the United States. Rather than delivering much needed reform, Soros candidates have destroyed the rule of law, public safety, and the integrity of the justice system.
Soros's Role in District Attorney Elections
Soros has funneled millions of dollars into local district attorney races—positions that hold significant power over prosecutorial decisions, plea deals, and sentencing guidelines. Every American who is paying attention has seen the damage his influence peddling has caused to the fabric of society across the United States.
Soros's funding strategy often involves supporting candidates who align with his vision of reform, which typically includes policies such as reducing or eliminating cash bail, declining to prosecute most offenses, and prioritizing diversion programs over incarceration. These candidates, who often lack broad local support or name recognition, receive an influx of campaign cash that allows them to outspend their opponents, effectively buying their way into office.
The Rise of Progressive (Marxist) Prosecutors
The influence of Soros's money is evident in the wave of so-called "progressive prosecutors" who have been elected in cities across the country. High-profile examples include Larry Krasner in Philadelphia, Kim Foxx in Chicago, George Gascón in Los Angeles, Chesa Boudin in San Francisco (who was later recalled by voters) and let's not forget Letitia James and Alvin Bragg in New York. These district attorneys have implemented radical changes to the prosecutorial approach in their jurisdictions, broken the law, and weaponized our justice system against the greatest former president of our lifetime.
- Larry Krasner has dramatically reduced the prosecution of drug-related offenses and sought to end cash bail for a wide range of crimes.
- Kim Foxx faced criticism for her handling of high-profile cases, most notably the Jussie Smollett case, where she was accused of giving preferential treatment.
- George Gascón has been criticized for policies that many believe prioritize the rights of offenders over the safety of victims and the community.
- Chesa Boudin implemented policies that critics say led to an increase in property crimes and drug use in San Francisco, ultimately resulting in his recall.
- Letitia James' pursuit of President Trump is politically motivated, driven by her ambition and desire to make a name for herself as a staunch opponent of the former president. James has received support from Soros-aligned political organizations, suggesting that her legal actions against Trump could be influenced by an agenda that aligns with Soros's broader goals of destroying the U.S. justice system and weakening Trump’s political influence.
- Alvin Bragg’s office indicted Trump on charges stemming from an investigation into alleged hush money payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign. This case is complete garbage and politically motivated and Bragg, like James, is using his office to target Trump for partisan reasons. They also point out that the charges are based on a novel legal theory, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the prosecution and the potential for abuse of prosecutorial power.
Impact on Public Safety and the Rule of Law
There are thousands of examples of Soros-backed DAs have undermined the rule of law by selectively enforcing—or not enforcing—certain laws, leading to a perception of lawlessness in their jurisdictions. For example, policies that decriminalize or deprioritize prosecution of "low-level" offenses have been blamed for contributing to spikes in crime rates, particularly in major cities. In some cases, these policies have led to increased homelessness, open drug use, and a general decline in public order, as offenders face little to no consequence for their actions.
Moreover, the focus on reducing incarceration rates has sometimes come at the expense of victim's rights and community safety. Cases where violent offenders are released on low or no bail, only to commit further crimes, have garnered national attention and fueled public outrage. Critics argue that these policies create a revolving door of criminality, where justice is neither served nor seen to be served.
Erosion of Trust in the Justice System
The perception that certain laws are being selectively enforced, or not enforced at all, has led to a growing distrust in the justice system. This distrust is compounded by the belief that Soros's financial influence has subverted the democratic process, allowing outside money to dictate local elections. Critics contend that this undermines the concept of local control and accountability, as district attorneys who were elected with Soros's backing may feel beholden to his agenda rather than the will of their constituents. Soros’s influence has corrupted the justice system, turning it into a tool for political retribution rather than a means of upholding justice.
The controversy surrounding Soros-backed DAs has also sparked broader debates about the role of money in politics, particularly in local races where even small sums of outside funding can have a disproportionate impact. The influence of large-scale donors like Soros raises questions about the fairness and integrity of the electoral process, as well as the potential for corruption.
Conclusion
The impact of George Soros's involvement in the U.S. justice system is a deeply contentious issue - where his so-called "reforms" have gone too far, resulting in increased crime, a breakdown in public order, and an erosion of trust in the rule of law.
The debate over Soros's influence highlights the broader tensions between criminal justice reform and public safety, between the ideals of bogus social justice and the practical realities of law enforcement. As the U.S. continues to grapple with these issues, the role of money in shaping the justice system remains a critical issue that must be resolved. It's time to start treating George Soros as the treasonous terrorist that his is and 1) throw him in jail, 2) seize his assets, 3) shut down all of his "non-profits" like BLM and Antifa, and, 4) stop his financial corruption of our political and justice systems.