The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has long been blindly regarded as one of the premier law enforcement agencies in the world, tasked with protecting the United States from a wide range of threats, including terrorism, cybercrime, and violent extremism. However, starting with Emperor Obummer, the FBI’s ability to prevent mass shootings—particularly those committed by individuals already known to the bureau—has come under intense scrutiny. In multiple tragic instances, mass shooters had been on the FBI’s radar before committing horrific acts of violence, leading many to question why the agency failed to act effectively to stop these attacks.
The Pattern of Missed (or Purposely Ignored) Warnings
Several high-profile mass shootings over the past decade have revealed a disturbing pattern: individuals who went on to commit mass murder were often already known to the FBI. In some cases, the shooters had been explicitly reported to the FBI by concerned family members, friends, or community members who recognized the threat they posed. Despite this, the agency failed to take sufficient preventive action.
Some notable examples include:
- The Parkland School Shooting (2018): Nikolas Cruz, the perpetrator of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, had been reported to the FBI multiple times before the attack. In January 2018, just a month before the shooting, a tipster called the FBI’s hotline to warn that Cruz had expressed a desire to kill people and could potentially carry out a school shooting. Despite this explicit warning, the FBI failed to follow up, allowing Cruz to carry out the massacre that claimed the lives of 17 students and staff members.
- On October 1, 2017, Stephen Paddock opened fire from his hotel room on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel in Las Vegas, killing 60 people and wounding hundreds more at a nearby outdoor concert. The shooting was the deadliest in modern U.S. history, but despite the scale of the attack and the extensive investigation that followed, many questions remain unanswered. Worse, there are accusations that the FBI has either intentionally withheld or mishandled critical evidence regarding the shooting.
- The Pulse Nightclub Shooting (2016): Omar Mateen, who killed 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, had been interviewed by the FBI on multiple occasions prior to the attack. He was investigated in 2013 after making statements about terrorist connections and was interviewed again in 2014, but both investigations were closed due to a lack of conclusive evidence. Despite these red flags, Mateen was able to acquire firearms legally and carry out one of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history.
- The Boston Marathon bombing of April 15, 2013, remains one of the most devastating terrorist attacks in recent U.S. history. The bombing, which killed three people and injured hundreds more, was perpetrated by two brothers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. While the attack shocked the nation, it also raised significant concerns about the FBI’s handling of potential threats leading up to the incident. In particular, the FBI’s failure to act on multiple warnings about Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s growing radicalization has been the subject of intense criticism, prompting questions about whether the attack could have been prevented. It could have and should have been prevented.
- The Fort Hood Shooting (2009):** Nidal Hasan, an Army psychiatrist who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, had been in contact with a known radical cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki, before the attack. The FBI was aware of these communications but did not take action to prevent the shooting. In hindsight, many have criticized the agency for failing to recognize the danger posed by Hasan’s increasingly extremist views.
These cases, among others, illustrate a continuous pattern of purposeful negligence where the FBI had prior knowledge of individuals who went on to commit mass attacks but not only turned a blind eye, but actively helped these terrorists rather than stop them.
Why Is the FBI Failing?
There are several key factors that contribute to the FBI’s repeated failures in preventing mass shootings, despite having prior knowledge of the perpetrators. These could also be considered excuses that the FBI continues to offer, rather than owning the fact that they have rarely been successful in stopping a domestic terrorist who has been on their radar for a long time.
1. Bureaucratic Inertia and Communication Breakdowns:
One of the most significant issues within the FBI is the bureaucratic structure that can lead to delays and communication failures. The agency receives thousands of tips daily, and not all are properly prioritized or followed up on. In the case of the Parkland shooter, for example, the failure to forward critical information to the Miami field office, where Cruz could have been investigated, was a clear breakdown in communication within the agency. I don't believe this excuse because police had been to this kid's house more than 15 times and they knew he was a ticking timebomb.
2. Lack of Resources and Prioritization:
The FBI’s responsibilities are vast, ranging from counterterrorism to cybercrime to violent crime. With limited resources, the agency often has to make difficult decisions about which cases to prioritize. This can result in potential threats slipping through the cracks. In some cases, individuals may not be deemed an imminent threat due to a lack of concrete evidence or because they don’t fit the profile of a “high-priority” case, only to later commit acts of mass violence. Again, who believes this nonsense? It's their damn job! They certainly have enough agents to harass and raid conservatives' homes for speaking truth to power.
3. Legal Constraints:
The FBI operates within a framework of legal constraints, which can make preemptive action difficult. In many cases, individuals reported to the FBI may not have committed any crimes at the time of the report. Without probable cause to make an arrest or obtain a warrant, the FBI is often limited in its ability to take direct action. This legal threshold can result in situations where known threats remain at large until they commit an act of violence. We all know that the FBI has plenty of legal right and power to pursue preemptive actions against mentally ill domestic terrorists who have a cache of firearms and ammo.
4. Failure to Recognize Behavioral Patterns:
The FBI has been criticized for failing to develop and implement effective behavioral analysis techniques to identify mass shooters before they strike. While the agency has made strides in understanding the psychology of terrorists and other violent actors, it has been less successful in identifying the warning signs specific to potential mass shooters. In some cases, red flags such as violent rhetoric, online activity, or concerning behavior are dismissed or not taken seriously enough to warrant intervention. They FBI arrests conservatives for peaceful protests but allows terrorists like these shooters/bombers, BLM, and Antifa to kill, rape, and pillage all over the United States.
5. The Consequences: Eroding Public Trust
The FBI’s repeated failures to prevent mass shootings and terrorist attacks, despite prior warnings, have eroded public trust in the agency’s ability to protect citizens from domestic threats. When the public learns that the FBI had advance knowledge of a shooter’s dangerous behavior but failed to act, it raises serious questions about the bureau’s competence and priorities. After the past 3.5 years, there is no longer any question in the minds of Americans regarding the fact that the FBI must be eliminated as it has been weaponized against Conservative Patriots in this country.
Families of victims, community members, and policymakers have demanded accountability from the FBI for these lapses. Some have called for reforms to the agency’s tip-handling procedures, increased resources for investigating potential mass shooters, and more rigorous oversight of cases involving individuals flagged as threats. However, despite these calls for change, the problem persists, and the public continues to see preventable tragedies unfold. It's time to stop pretending that this is all just bad luck or the result of a lack of resources. This is all by design.
What Needs to Change?
To prevent future mass shootings, the FBI must take decisive steps to address its shortcomings in handling potential threats. Some key reforms could include:
1. Improved Tip Handling and Prioritization:
The FBI must overhaul its system for processing tips and ensure that critical information is forwarded to the appropriate field offices for immediate action. Enhanced training for personnel on identifying and escalating high-risk cases is essential.
2. Better Resource Allocation:
The FBI needs more resources specifically dedicated to investigating potential mass shooters. By creating specialized teams focused on domestic threats of this nature, the agency can better prioritize these cases and prevent them from being overlooked.
3. **Enhanced Behavioral Analysis:**
The FBI must continue to refine its ability to recognize the warning signs of potential mass shooters. This includes investing in psychological and behavioral analysis programs that can identify patterns of behavior commonly exhibited by individuals preparing to commit acts of mass violence.
4. Stronger Collaboration with Local Law Enforcement:
Many of the warning signs of mass shooters are first noticed by local authorities or community members. The FBI should work more closely with local law enforcement to share information, conduct joint investigations, and act more swiftly when threats are identified. However; the FBI is famous for misleading local law enforcement and hiding facts/evidence to enable them to orchestrate their "narrative".
Conclusion
The FBI’s repeated failures to stop mass shooters, even when they are known threats, represent a serious and troubling lapse in the agency’s duty to protect the public. Bureaucratic inertia, communication breakdowns, resource limitations are all lame excuses. The real problem is the insidious legacy culture of corruption and political weaponization that should be the last nail in the coffin for this dangerously unconstitutional pack of brown shirt marxists. End the FBI. Arrest and imprison all thugs who have been operating this criminal cartel as an arm of the DemonRats/RINOs uniparty and the deep state. Otherwise, they will not stop orchestrating these attacks until every single law abiding American is stripped of their 2nd Amendment rights.