Prioritizing Politics Over People: How FEMA Funds Were Stolen By Biden/Harris

Prioritizing Politics Over People: How FEMA Funds Were Stolen By Biden/Harris

The Biden administration’s handling of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds has become a point of concern, as reports surface indicating that substantial portions of the budget have been diverted to support the surge of illegal immigrants. While the humanitarian need at the border is real, the reallocation of FEMA resources for non-citizens at the expense of U.S. flood victims in North Carolina and Tennessee represents a troubling mismanagement of priorities.

FEMA’s purpose is to provide relief to American citizens facing natural disasters—whether that be hurricanes, wildfires, or in this case, catastrophic flooding. The recent devastation from floods in North Carolina and Tennessee has left thousands of Americans displaced, homes destroyed, and livelihoods upended. Yet, as residents cry out for assistance, it has been reported that FEMA’s financial capacity to respond has been severely weakened, partly due to the reallocation of resources to address the border crisis.

A Misallocation (Theft) of Resources

FEMA’s budget is designed to provide immediate and effective relief to Americans who are victims of natural disasters. These funds are supposed to ensure rapid deployment of resources to prevent loss of life, mitigate damage, and help citizens rebuild their lives. Unfortunately, under the current administration, a significant portion of these funds has been directed towards addressing the influx of illegal immigrants at the southern border, straining an already limited budget.

This misallocation has left many flood victims in North Carolina and Tennessee without the support they desperately need. Entire communities, already struggling with the emotional and financial toll of a natural disaster, are being forced to navigate bureaucratic delays and a lack of resources because FEMA’s reserves are being drained by a political crisis elsewhere.

The Border Crisis vs. Natural Disaster Relief

The Biden administration’s response to the border crisis has been controversial from the start. As the surge of illegal immigration reached record levels, the federal government has diverted resources, including FEMA’s, to provide temporary shelter, food, healthcare, and legal services for migrants. While some argue that these actions are rooted in compassion, the decision to prioritize border spending over natural disaster relief raises ethical questions about the role of government and the prioritization of American citizens.

Natural disasters, unlike the man-made crisis at the border, are unavoidable. Americans in flood-ravaged areas did not choose to face destruction; they are victims of circumstance. Meanwhile, the border crisis stems from policy decisions and immigration enforcement, making it something that could potentially be managed without draining disaster relief funds.

Real Consequences for Americans

For flood victims, this funding diversion is more than a political debate—it’s a harsh reality with real-world consequences. Without sufficient FEMA support, victims are left vulnerable, forced to rely on local charities, non-profits, and personal savings that are often insufficient to meet the level of destruction caused by floods.

In North Carolina, floodwaters have displaced families, destroyed property, and upended local economies. Small towns have been washed away, and farmers are facing catastrophic losses to their crops and livestock. Similarly, in Tennessee, the flooding has left entire neighborhoods underwater, with residents pleading for government assistance that has been slow to materialize.

To learn that FEMA is unable to adequately respond because its funds are being diverted to other non-emergency causes is not just a bureaucratic failure—it is an outright betrayal of the American people who pay taxes and expect their government to be there for them in times of crisis.

A Call for Reprioritization

It’s time for the Biden administration to reevaluate its priorities. The role of FEMA is clear—it exists to serve American citizens in the wake of natural disasters, not to provide emergency relief for political crises at the border. The people of North Carolina and Tennessee need help now, not excuses.

Redirecting FEMA’s disaster relief funds to non-citizens at a time when American families are suffering is not just bad policy—it is a breach of the government’s responsibility to its own people. The "humanitarian need" at the border was created by Biden/Harris and that should not come at the cost of leaving disaster victims without the support they desperately need.

If the Biden administration truly believes in putting Americans first, it must ensure that FEMA’s resources are preserved for their intended purpose: to help the American people in times of crisis.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.