The United States was founded on the belief that certain rights are inalienable—those that are inherent and cannot be taken away or surrendered. These rights are closely tied to the principles of personal liberty, human dignity, and individual self-determination. In the context of health and personal decisions, three fundamental rights stand out: the right to bodily autonomy, the right to medical sovereignty, and the right to informed consent. These principles are deeply ingrained in the legal and ethical framework of the nation, guiding everything from healthcare decisions to personal freedoms.
Unfortunately, most Americans are not aware of their rights and/or are under the impression that somehow politicians and medical professionals have some authority over their personal decisions. They don't.
1. The Right to Bodily Autonomy
Definition: The right to bodily autonomy refers to the inherent freedom individuals have to make decisions about their own bodies, free from external control or coercion. This right is based on the principle that every person has full ownership over their physical self and should be able to make choices about their body without undue influence from others, including the government, employers, or other entities like doctors and hospitals.
Historical Context
The right to bodily autonomy is not new but has gained more explicit recognition in modern legal systems. This concept can be traced back to classical liberalism, which champions the idea of personal liberty and the belief that individuals have the inherent right to control their own lives. In the U.S., this right is implied in several constitutional amendments, including the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, which has been interpreted to cover privacy rights, including decisions about one’s body.
Modern Applications
Bodily autonomy plays a crucial role in a range of contemporary issues:
- Contraception: Debates around contraception center on a person’s right to make decisions about their reproductive health without governmental interference.
- Risky Surgeries/Procedures: The right to bodily autonomy is fundamental for individuals making decisions related to any kind of procedures where there is a high chance of negative outcomes.
- End-of-life care: Individuals have the right to refuse life-prolonging treatments or choose assisted dying (where legal) based on their personal beliefs and wishes.
Legal Protections and Challenges
Though bodily autonomy is a fundamental right, it has been contested in various legal and political arenas. For instance, Supreme Court decisions like *Roe v. Wade* (1973) and its subsequent overturning in *Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization* (2022) have reignited debates about the extent to which the government can regulate decisions about one’s body. But, let's be honest here, the radical left in this country only supports bodily autonomy when it comes to abortion, but they want to ignore this right when they want to force the general public to take unproven deadly "vaccines".
Despite these challenges, the right to bodily autonomy remains a core aspect of individual freedom in the United States, ensuring that people retain control over their bodies and the decisions that affect them. Never give up this right and never comply with draconian measures like we saw with the COVID plandemic.
2. The Right to Medical Sovereignty
Definition: The right to medical sovereignty emphasizes an individual’s power to make independent decisions about their healthcare. This right includes the freedom to choose or refuse medical treatments, seek alternative therapies, and make decisions without coercion or undue interference from external entities, such as governments or medical authorities.
The Evolution of Medical Sovereignty
The idea of medical sovereignty has evolved alongside advancements in medicine and changing societal norms about the relationship between doctors and patients. Historically, medical decisions were often made by physicians with minimal input from patients. However, the 20th century saw a shift toward patient-centered care, a model that emphasizes the patient's role as an active participant in their healthcare decisions. Every single one of us must strongly stand up for ourselves and our rights when dealing with corrupt medical charlatans and we must always act as a patient advocate for our family members who are not able to effectively stand up for themselves.
Several landmark legal cases in the U.S. have cemented the principle of medical sovereignty:
- Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital (1914): This case recognized a patient’s right to refuse medical treatment, asserting that “every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body.”
- Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990): This case established that competent individuals have the right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment.
Implications of Medical Sovereignty
Medical sovereignty extends beyond the doctor-patient relationship to encompass broader health decisions:
- Vaccination decisions: Medical sovereignty plays a central role in debates about vaccine mandates and whether individuals should have the right to refuse vaccination on personal, religious, or philosophical grounds. This is a ludicrous debate, however, because we all have the right to refuse the poison COVID shots especially since they are neither safe nor effective. We must all keep in mind that the government does not now and never will have the right to force any of us to take any shots when they launch the next plandemic.
- Alternative medicine: Many people turn to alternative or holistic therapies in lieu of or in addition to conventional medical treatments. Medical sovereignty supports the individual’s right to pursue the care they deem best for their own health and well-being. A key accomplishment of the Trump administration was passing the "Right To Try" act which not only supported medical sovereignty but allowed people to take experimental treatments which were previously unavailable due to the monopolies held by the big pharmaceutical companies.
- End-of-life decisions: Medical sovereignty is also critical in discussions surrounding do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and the right to die with dignity.
The Role of Government and Society
Medical sovereignty is a fundamental right. Period. Public health considerations, such as mandatory vaccination policies during a pandemic, clashed with individual medical sovereignty during COVID-19 but the fact remains - NOBODY can override our individual rights. The marxists in the current administration keep trying to say they're striking a balance between individual rights and societal welfare, but that is completely false.
3. The Right to Informed Consent
Definition: Informed consent is the right of individuals to be fully informed about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of any medical treatment or procedure before deciding whether to proceed. It ensures that individuals make health decisions with full knowledge and without coercion, and it is rooted in the ethical principle of autonomy.
The Foundation of Informed Consent
Informed consent is a relatively modern concept, having gained prominence in the 20th century in response to unethical medical practices, such as non-consensual experimentation. The Nuremberg Code, developed in response to the atrocities committed during World War II, was one of the first international documents to articulate the necessity of voluntary consent in medical research. There should have been a Nuremberg Trial 2.0 after the genocide committed by the US Government (CDC, FDA, NIH, Obama, Fauci, etc.). We should all be concerned that nobody has been held accountable for the biggest global genocide in history because they have been emboldened to do it again before November 5th.
In the U.S., the right to informed consent was legally established through a series of court cases, with the landmark **Canterbury v. Spence** (1972) ruling affirming that doctors must disclose all relevant information to patients about medical procedures, including risks, potential outcomes, and alternatives. So, it is up to every single US citizen to push back and exercise your rights.
Key Components of Informed Consent
For informed consent to be valid, several criteria must be met:
- Disclosure: Patients must be provided with all the relevant information about the treatment or procedure, including potential risks and benefits. This was ignored and violated for most Americans during COVID because the US government and big pharma companies lied about the safety and effectiveness of the COVID death jabs, and they lied about hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin being ineffective to treat COVID. They also lied about Remdesivir + ventilator as being an effective treatment of COVID. That particular treatment was actually a death sentence for unsuspecting people who were lied to by doctors, hospitals, and the government. Those poor people were murdered.
- Comprehension: The patient must understand the information provided. This means medical professionals have a responsibility to ensure that patients are not overwhelmed by jargon and that they fully grasp the potential outcomes.
- Voluntariness: The patient’s decision must be made without any form of coercion or manipulation.
- Competence: The individual must be of sound mind and legal age to make their own medical decisions.
Why Informed Consent Matters
Informed consent serves as a safeguard for patient autonomy and medical sovereignty. It ensures that individuals are not subjected to treatments or interventions without their explicit approval, aligning with the broader ethical and legal norms that emphasize personal agency. Informed consent is particularly important in:
- Clinical trials and medical research: Protecting participants from exploitation and ensuring their rights.
- Surgical procedures: Offering patients the ability to weigh the risks before undergoing potentially life-altering treatments.
- Routine medical care: Even in everyday healthcare decisions, informed consent empowers individuals to take charge of their well-being.
- When corrupt government entities like CDC and NIH pushing experimental drugs that failed initial trials (COVID death shots from Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J) and falsely claim that have authority to ignore informed consent.
Conclusion
The rights to bodily autonomy, medical sovereignty, and informed consent are cornerstones of personal freedom in the United States and they are continuously under attack by power-drunk politicians and bureaucrats. These rights empower individuals to make deeply personal decisions about their bodies and health, free from coercion and undue influence. As healthcare evolves and societal values shift, it remains essential to protect and uphold these rights to ensure that personal liberty remains a defining feature of the American experience.
These rights, while sometimes challenged or debated, form the bedrock of the individual’s ability to make choices that align with their values, beliefs, and needs—preserving human dignity in the most personal areas of life. We can't allow Kamala Harris and the deep state to steal another election because we will lose all of our rights if that happens.